WHITEHALL, SW1
Ref 2 NOV 18
November, 1918,
I am directed by the President of Local Government Board to advert to your letter of the 12th September last (2512/1918) relative to Ordinance No.6 1918 of the Legislature of Hong Kong to state that sub-sections (1) and (2) of Section 20 seem open to criticism imposing liability on a contractor in respect of acts unlawfully done though he may know nothing about the doing of them, and may not in any way have authorised the doing of them.
In this country a similar provision is to be brought about by byelaw it is probable that the Court would hold the byelaw to be unreasonable and therefore invalid.
The Board may call attention to the provisions of the law in England dealing with the precautions to be taken...
as at A is my minute pour it out as 42572/18 as showing the absurdity other Pub Section), send copy to MGB & anon for Meheal, adding that there would be no objection to their being circulated on the lines of the beylish Qets refined MGBS:
| Abs | Apps |
|---|---|
| 9.8.2.11.15 |
LOCALISE, PARL, LONDON. Telephone :—Victoria 2824.
Soo 42512
The Under Secretary of State, Colonial Office.
Reply should quote the Number, Reference Letter and Date of this Letter.
Telegraphic Address:--
Page 361 C. 1918.
as at A is my minute
pouit out
as
42572/18 / as shoving the absurdity other Pub
Section), send cous brt2GB & aon for
Meheal, adding that there would be no
Thjection
to their by solarins on the lines ofthe beylish
Qets refined MGBS:
Abs. Apps
Are
9.8.2.11.15
Алпи
(
361 C. 1918.
reply_should quote the Number, Reference Latter and Pote of this Letter.
Egraphic Address:--
1.OCALISE, PARL, LONDON." Bephone :—Victoria 2824.
Soo 42512
محمد
5215
225
LOCAL GOVEREDENT BOARD,
Ref 2 NOV 18
WHITEHALL, SWI
November, 1918,
I am directed by the President of Local Government Board to advert to pr letter of the 12th September last 2512/1918) relative to Ordinance No.6 1918 of the Legislature of Hong Kong to state that sub-sections (1) and of Section 20 seem open to criticism Imposing liability on a contractor respect of acts unlawfully done bugh he may know nothing about the ing of them, and may not in any way
If ve authorised the doing of them.
this country a similar proceeding re to be brought about by byelaw it probable that the Court would hold e byelaw to be unreasonable and there- r invalid.
The Board may call attention to
e provisions of the law in England ling with the precautions to be Ken in connection with building
le Under Secretary of State, Colonial Office.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.